Theater Owners Want Summer to Begin in April
Filed under: Action, Exhibition, Family Films, Remakes and Sequels, Summer Movies
Officially, the season of summer doesn't begin for another two weeks, but for the movie business, summer 2008 started back on May 2, with the release of Iron Man. Though it seemed like an early enough start, some exhibitors would like it to begin even earlier, like in April. In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, John Fithian, who heads the National Association of Theatre Owners (the largest trade group for cinema operators), and Mike Campbell (no relation), who runs Regal Entertainment (the largest cinema chain in the U.S.), discuss the benefits of having tentpole (aka blockbuster) movies released all year long rather than in just the summer and winter holiday seasons and ask that Hollywood at least consider bumping up some major releases to April rather than the busy month of May.The argument for limiting tentpoles to the summer has always been that it's a time when kids are out from school. But as Fithian points out, most kids are still in school through May, when the biggest blockbusters are released. And movies like Iron Man and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull still made a lot of money anyway. In fact, aside from whatever tentpole is scheduled for July 4th weekend, the movies released in May are often the biggest moneymakers of the year. At least for Hollywood. But according to Fithian, theater owners actually lost a lot of money in May because of how many tentpoles are released so closely together. Campbell adds that overall box office gross would be up significantly if major releases were more evenly spread out. Certainly moviegoers would appreciate having more blockbusters and/or better movies released in months like January and September, as well as other months often considered "dumping grounds" for movies that shouldn't have even been made.
Other interesting bits that came up during the interview include both Fithian and Campbell's preference for more family-friendly films of any genre. Though this shouldn't be surprising, it is worth noting that Fithian also championed the removal of the NC-17 stigma only a year ago. Now he's claiming that he doesn't understand why Hollywood would bother with "Quentin Tarantino" kinds of movies when family films are more lucrative (especially for theaters, which make a lot of dough off candy craving kids). Both men are also in agreement that Hollywood shouldn't put too many eggs in the 3-D basket, because, as Campbell notes, not everyone is an advocate and many moviegoers would still prefer to have a 2-D option.
For more on the current state of the theater business, including discussion of the recession, over-screening and other stuff that only I might find interesting, check out the full interview here.
Related Headlines
Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-05-2008 @ 1:58PM
C Symank said...
Wow! I don't know what to think about this. While it would be great to see some excitement during the rest of the year, I think that the distributors are simply asking to make a problem worse. The problem is exactly what was described... putting too many blockbusters together in the same period. To be honest, most of the watchable films are released in May and the rest of the summer tends to feel like it's filled with left overs (though there are notable exceptions i.e. Wall_E, The Dark Knight, etc.). If they start releasing tentpoles in April I predict that this will only result in pile up of big movies in late April and a summer with even fewer "event" pictures.
Instead, they simply need to spread these big films out throughout the calendar. "300" was released in the off months between Christmas and Summer and was huge. It had zero competition and made a ton of bucks as a result. Would it have had the same impact if it was released this past May? I doubt it.
It might also allow smaller blockbusters (if there is such a thing) the chance to make more money if they weren't released one right after another in May. Prince Caspian has made over $100 million since it's release but this is a big disappointment to the suits at Disney who are trying to build a franchise. How much of this was a result of the movie's quality (I personally thought it was good) versus it's need to overcome enormous competition from the likes of Iron Man and Indy. Heck, even the train wreck that was Speed Racer may have done a bit better if it had been released in February or October over May.
Perhaps I sound like an echo chamber to the above, but the I just don't think the answer is earlier releases in April. Spread them out throughout the year and both the studios and the distributors will make more money.
Reply